Russian Federation vs Tonga: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Russian Federation
25.5%
in 2025
Tonga
26.1%
in 2025
Russian Federation rank
172nd
Tonga rank
170th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Russian Federation
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 26.1% against 25.5% in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 172nd and Tonga ranks 170th of 222 countries.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.3% | 24.8% | 3.5% | Tonga |
| 2010s | 24.1% | 26.1% | 1.9% | Tonga |
| 2020s | 25.5% | 26.1% | 0.6% | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Russian Federation or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 26.1% against 25.5% in Russian Federation as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Russian Federation and Tonga?
- 0.6%, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Tonga?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Russian Federation and Tonga rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Russian Federation ranks 172nd and Tonga ranks 170th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.