Serbia vs Sri Lanka: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Serbia
45.1%
in 2025
Sri Lanka
45.2%
in 2025
Serbia rank
121st
Sri Lanka rank
118th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Serbia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 45.2% against 45.1% in Serbia, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 121st and Sri Lanka ranks 118th of 222 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.1% | 37.7% | 20.6% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 24.0% | 44.4% | 20.4% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 40.0% | 45.2% | 5.2% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Serbia or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 45.2% against 45.1% in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Serbia and Sri Lanka?
- 0.1%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Serbia and Sri Lanka rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Serbia ranks 121st and Sri Lanka ranks 118th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.