Sri Lanka vs Saint Lucia: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Sri Lanka
45.2%
in 2025
Saint Lucia
45.6%
in 2025
Sri Lanka rank
118th
Saint Lucia rank
117th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Sri Lanka
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 45.6% against 45.2% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 118th and Saint Lucia ranks 117th of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.7% | 34.5% | 3.2% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 44.4% | 45.6% | 1.1% | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 45.2% | 45.6% | 0.4% | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Sri Lanka or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 45.6% against 45.2% in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Sri Lanka and Saint Lucia?
- 0.4%, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Saint Lucia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Sri Lanka and Saint Lucia rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Sri Lanka ranks 118th and Saint Lucia ranks 117th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.