Saint Lucia vs East Timor: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Saint Lucia
45.6%
in 2025
East Timor
45.6%
in 2025
Saint Lucia rank
131st
East Timor rank
129th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Saint Lucia
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 45.6% against 45.6% in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Saint Lucia ranks 131st and East Timor ranks 129th of 253 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Saint Lucia averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.5% | 19.9% | 14.6% | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 45.6% | 42.6% | 2.9% | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 45.6% | 45.6% | 0.0% | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Saint Lucia or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 45.6% against 45.6% in Saint Lucia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Saint Lucia and East Timor?
- 0.0%, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and East Timor?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Saint Lucia and East Timor rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Saint Lucia ranks 131st and East Timor ranks 129th of 253 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.