Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Bagasse — Energy consumption
Bagasse — Energy consumption over time
- Ecuador
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 10,816 TJ against 8,198 TJ in Ecuador, a difference of 2,618 TJ.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Ecuador ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 85 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,034 TJ | 10,071 TJ | 37.06 TJ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 12,426 TJ | 12,808 TJ | 381.75 TJ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bagasse — energy consumption, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 10,816 TJ against 8,198 TJ in Ecuador as of 2005.
- What is the difference in bagasse — energy consumption between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 2,618 TJ, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2005.
- How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for bagasse — energy consumption?
- Ecuador ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Bagasse — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.