Middle Africa vs Zimbabwe: Bagasse — Energy consumption
Bagasse — Energy consumption over time
- Middle Africa
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Middle Africa currently reports 13,971 TJ against 10,816 TJ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3,155 TJ.
That makes Middle Africa's figure about 1.3 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Middle Africa ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 28 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5,467 TJ | 10,071 TJ | 4,604 TJ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 5,854 TJ | 12,808 TJ | 6,954 TJ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bagasse — energy consumption, Middle Africa or Zimbabwe?
- Middle Africa, at 13,971 TJ against 10,816 TJ in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in bagasse — energy consumption between Middle Africa and Zimbabwe?
- 3,155 TJ, with Middle Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Zimbabwe?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2005.
- How do Middle Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for bagasse — energy consumption?
- Middle Africa ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 28 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Bagasse — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.