Ecuador vs Eswatini: Bagasse — Energy production
Bagasse — Energy production over time
- Ecuador
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 13,668 TJ against 12,763 TJ in Ecuador, a difference of 905 TJ.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 27th and Eswatini ranks 26th of 87 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,034 TJ | 8,075 TJ | 1,959 TJ | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 12,308 TJ | 10,411 TJ | 1,896 TJ | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 10,836 TJ | 12,444 TJ | 1,607 TJ | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 11,851 TJ | 14,245 TJ | 2,395 TJ | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bagasse — energy production, Ecuador or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 13,668 TJ against 12,763 TJ in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in bagasse — energy production between Ecuador and Eswatini?
- 905 TJ, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eswatini?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Eswatini rank globally for bagasse — energy production?
- Ecuador ranks 27th and Eswatini ranks 26th of 87 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Bagasse — Energy production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.