Mali vs Zimbabwe: Bagasse — Energy production
Bagasse — Energy production over time
- Mali
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1,024 TJ against 895.76 TJ in Mali, a difference of 128.24 TJ.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Mali ranks 67th and Zimbabwe ranks 64th of 87 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 772.21 TJ | 10,071 TJ | 9,299 TJ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 861.01 TJ | 10,457 TJ | 9,596 TJ | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 895.76 TJ | 2,703 TJ | 1,807 TJ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 895.76 TJ | 888.28 TJ | 7.48 TJ | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bagasse — energy production, Mali or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1,024 TJ against 895.76 TJ in Mali as of 2024.
- What is the difference in bagasse — energy production between Mali and Zimbabwe?
- 128.24 TJ, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mali and Zimbabwe rank globally for bagasse — energy production?
- Mali ranks 67th and Zimbabwe ranks 64th of 87 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Bagasse — Energy production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.