China vs Latvia: Belarus — Industrial roundwood, non-coniferous non-tropical
Belarus — Industrial roundwood, non-coniferous non-tropical over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
China currently reports 3,000 m3 against 2,775 m3 in Latvia, a difference of 225 m3.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
China ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 3rd of 22 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher belarus — industrial roundwood, non-coniferous non-tropical, China or Latvia?
- China, at 3,000 m3 against 2,775 m3 in Latvia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in belarus — industrial roundwood, non-coniferous non-tropical between China and Latvia?
- 225 m3, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2017.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for belarus — industrial roundwood, non-coniferous non-tropical?
- China ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 3rd of 22 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Belarus — Industrial roundwood, non-coniferous non-tropical (export/import) — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The database contains data on the bilateral trade flows in roundwood, primary wood and paper products for all countries and territories in the world. The main types of primary forest products included in are: roundwood, sawnwood, wood-based panels, pulp, and paper and paperboard. These products are detailed further. The definitions are available. More detailed information on wood products, including definitions, can be found at: https://www.fao.org/forestry/statistics/80572/en/