Australia vs Finland: Biogases — Energy consumption
Biogases — Energy consumption over time
- Australia
- Finland
How they compare
Australia currently reports 1,160 TJ against 879 TJ in Finland, a difference of 281 TJ.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Finland ahead.
Australia ranks 16th and Finland ranks 18th of 55 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Finland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 693.29 TJ | 621.86 TJ | 71.43 TJ | Australia |
| 2010s | 1,820 TJ | 1,604 TJ | 216.01 TJ | Australia |
| 2020s | 1,786 TJ | 3,491 TJ | 1,705 TJ | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biogases — energy consumption, Australia or Finland?
- Australia, at 1,160 TJ against 879 TJ in Finland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in biogases — energy consumption between Australia and Finland?
- 281 TJ, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Finland?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Finland rank globally for biogases — energy consumption?
- Australia ranks 16th and Finland ranks 18th of 55 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biogases — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.