Iceland vs Mauritius: Biogases — Energy production
Biogases — Energy production over time
- Iceland
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 159.8 TJ against 108.11 TJ in Iceland, a difference of 51.69 TJ.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.5 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 68th and Mauritius ranks 65th of 84 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 69.57 TJ | 213.84 TJ | 144.28 TJ | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 91.78 TJ | 210.34 TJ | 118.56 TJ | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biogases — energy production, Iceland or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 159.8 TJ against 108.11 TJ in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in biogases — energy production between Iceland and Mauritius?
- 51.69 TJ, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritius?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Mauritius rank globally for biogases — energy production?
- Iceland ranks 68th and Mauritius ranks 65th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biogases — Energy production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.