Finland vs Malawi: Biogasoline — Energy consumption
Finland
241.2 TJ
in 2024
Malawi
146.6 TJ
in 2024
Finland rank
51st
Malawi rank
52nd
Biogasoline — Energy consumption over time
- Finland
- Malawi
How they compare
Finland currently reports 241.2 TJ against 146.6 TJ in Malawi, a difference of 94.6 TJ.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.6 times Malawi's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 51st and Malawi ranks 52nd of 61 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3,270 TJ | 335.96 TJ | 2,934 TJ | Finland |
| 2020s | 3,666 TJ | 211.22 TJ | 3,455 TJ | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biogasoline — energy consumption, Finland or Malawi?
- Finland, at 241.2 TJ against 146.6 TJ in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in biogasoline — energy consumption between Finland and Malawi?
- 94.6 TJ, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Malawi?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Malawi rank globally for biogasoline — energy consumption?
- Finland ranks 51st and Malawi ranks 52nd of 61 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biogasoline — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.