Oceania vs Romania: Biogasoline — Energy consumption
Biogasoline — Energy consumption over time
- Oceania
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 6,482 TJ against 4,568 TJ in Oceania, a difference of 1,914 TJ.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.4 times Oceania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Oceania ahead.
Oceania ranks 21st and Romania ranks 18th of 26 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Oceania averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,995 TJ | 107.2 TJ | 6,888 TJ | Oceania |
| 2010s | 5,477 TJ | 2,815 TJ | 2,662 TJ | Oceania |
| 2020s | 4,305 TJ | 5,578 TJ | 1,273 TJ | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biogasoline — energy consumption, Oceania or Romania?
- Romania, at 6,482 TJ against 4,568 TJ in Oceania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in biogasoline — energy consumption between Oceania and Romania?
- 1,914 TJ, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Romania?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Oceania and Romania rank globally for biogasoline — energy consumption?
- Oceania ranks 21st and Romania ranks 18th of 26 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biogasoline — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.