Oceania vs Sweden: Biogasoline — Energy production
Biogasoline — Energy production over time
- Oceania
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 5,280 TJ against 4,404 TJ in Oceania, a difference of 876 TJ.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.2 times Oceania's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Sweden ahead.
Oceania ranks 20th and Sweden ranks 21st of 27 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Oceania averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,848 TJ | 2,320 TJ | 528.34 TJ | Oceania |
| 2010s | 5,450 TJ | 4,336 TJ | 1,113 TJ | Oceania |
| 2020s | 4,217 TJ | 4,781 TJ | 563.84 TJ | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biogasoline — energy production, Oceania or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 5,280 TJ against 4,404 TJ in Oceania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in biogasoline — energy production between Oceania and Sweden?
- 876 TJ, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Sweden?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Oceania and Sweden rank globally for biogasoline — energy production?
- Oceania ranks 20th and Sweden ranks 21st of 27 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biogasoline — Energy production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.