Argentina vs United Republic of Tanzania: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area

Argentina
52.73 kg/ha
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
13.42 kg/ha
in 2023
Argentina rank
4th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time

  • Argentina
  • United Republic of Tanzania
020406080100196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 52.73 kg/ha against 13.42 kg/ha in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 39.31 kg/ha.

That makes Argentina's figure about 3.9 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Argentina ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 176 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 6 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 1.94 kg/ha 2.66 kg/ha 0.7223 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 4.86 kg/ha 3.33 kg/ha 1.53 kg/ha Argentina
1980s 18.54 kg/ha 4.44 kg/ha 14.1 kg/ha Argentina
1990s 35.89 kg/ha 6.2 kg/ha 29.69 kg/ha Argentina
2000s 73 kg/ha 10.24 kg/ha 62.77 kg/ha Argentina
2010s 85.56 kg/ha 15.68 kg/ha 69.88 kg/ha Argentina
2020s 68.16 kg/ha 13.77 kg/ha 54.39 kg/ha Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Argentina or United Republic of Tanzania?
Argentina, at 52.73 kg/ha against 13.42 kg/ha in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Argentina and United Republic of Tanzania?
39.31 kg/ha, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
Argentina ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs United Republic of Tanzania: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/biological-fixation-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/argentina/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/biological-fixation-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/argentina/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Argentina vs United Republic of Tanzania: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
223 places, 12,870 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).