Austria vs Lithuania: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Austria
- Lithuania
How they compare
Austria currently reports 11.18 kg/ha against 10.89 kg/ha in Lithuania, a difference of 0.29 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 61st and Lithuania ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.06 kg/ha | 1.62 kg/ha | 6.44 kg/ha | Austria |
| 2000s | 5.84 kg/ha | 2.2 kg/ha | 3.64 kg/ha | Austria |
| 2010s | 7.09 kg/ha | 7.78 kg/ha | 0.6831 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 10.19 kg/ha | 10.43 kg/ha | 0.243 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Austria or Lithuania?
- Austria, at 11.18 kg/ha against 10.89 kg/ha in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Austria and Lithuania?
- 0.29 kg/ha, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Lithuania rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Austria ranks 61st and Lithuania ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).