Bhutan vs Czechia: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Bhutan
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 4.03 kg/ha against 3.78 kg/ha in Bhutan, a difference of 0.25 kg/ha.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 118th and Czechia ranks 115th of 191 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.88 kg/ha | 2.69 kg/ha | 2.19 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 5.37 kg/ha | 1.9 kg/ha | 3.47 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 6.99 kg/ha | 2.18 kg/ha | 4.81 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 4.38 kg/ha | 3.74 kg/ha | 0.639 kg/ha | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Bhutan or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 4.03 kg/ha against 3.78 kg/ha in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Bhutan and Czechia?
- 0.25 kg/ha, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Czechia rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Bhutan ranks 118th and Czechia ranks 115th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).