Botswana vs Tajikistan: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Botswana
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 3.73 kg/ha against 3.58 kg/ha in Botswana, a difference of 0.15 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 122nd and Tajikistan ranks 120th of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Tajikistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.11 kg/ha | 1.07 kg/ha | 0.0378 kg/ha | Botswana |
| 2000s | 1.38 kg/ha | 2.27 kg/ha | 0.8882 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 2.38 kg/ha | 3.93 kg/ha | 1.55 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 7.06 kg/ha | 3.75 kg/ha | 3.31 kg/ha | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Botswana or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 3.73 kg/ha against 3.58 kg/ha in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Botswana and Tajikistan?
- 0.15 kg/ha, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Tajikistan rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Botswana ranks 122nd and Tajikistan ranks 120th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).