Burkina Faso vs Estonia: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Burkina Faso
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 10.74 kg/ha against 10.36 kg/ha in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.38 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 65th and Estonia ranks 63rd of 176 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 3 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.47 kg/ha | 0.4296 kg/ha | 5.04 kg/ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 6.01 kg/ha | 0.6408 kg/ha | 5.37 kg/ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 6.51 kg/ha | 5.08 kg/ha | 1.44 kg/ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 9.46 kg/ha | 10.2 kg/ha | 0.7333 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Burkina Faso or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 10.74 kg/ha against 10.36 kg/ha in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Burkina Faso and Estonia?
- 0.38 kg/ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Estonia rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Burkina Faso ranks 65th and Estonia ranks 63rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).