Chile vs North Macedonia: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Chile
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 1.89 kg/ha against 1.75 kg/ha in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.14 kg/ha.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 139th and North Macedonia ranks 142nd of 176 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.13 kg/ha | 2.09 kg/ha | 1.04 kg/ha | Chile |
| 2000s | 3.24 kg/ha | 2.07 kg/ha | 1.17 kg/ha | Chile |
| 2010s | 2.52 kg/ha | 1.93 kg/ha | 0.5971 kg/ha | Chile |
| 2020s | 1.92 kg/ha | 1.75 kg/ha | 0.1787 kg/ha | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Chile or North Macedonia?
- Chile, at 1.89 kg/ha against 1.75 kg/ha in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Chile and North Macedonia?
- 0.14 kg/ha, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Chile and North Macedonia rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Chile ranks 139th and North Macedonia ranks 142nd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).