Costa Rica vs Czechoslovakia: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Costa Rica
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 4.65 kg/ha against 4.63 kg/ha in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 103rd and Czechoslovakia ranks 102nd of 176 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.41 kg/ha | 2.24 kg/ha | 4.17 kg/ha | Costa Rica |
| 1970s | 6.88 kg/ha | 1.43 kg/ha | 5.45 kg/ha | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 8.01 kg/ha | 2.53 kg/ha | 5.48 kg/ha | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 8.11 kg/ha | 3.83 kg/ha | 4.28 kg/ha | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Costa Rica or Czechoslovakia?
- Czechoslovakia, at 4.65 kg/ha against 4.63 kg/ha in Costa Rica as of 1992.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Costa Rica and Czechoslovakia?
- 0.02 kg/ha, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Costa Rica and Czechoslovakia rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Costa Rica ranks 103rd and Czechoslovakia ranks 102nd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).