Czechia vs Niger: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Czechia
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 4.44 kg/ha against 4.03 kg/ha in Czechia, a difference of 0.41 kg/ha.
That makes Niger's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 115th and Niger ranks 112th of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Niger in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.69 kg/ha | 1.46 kg/ha | 1.23 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | 1.9 kg/ha | 2.14 kg/ha | 0.24 kg/ha | Niger |
| 2010s | 2.18 kg/ha | 3.74 kg/ha | 1.56 kg/ha | Niger |
| 2020s | 3.74 kg/ha | 4.48 kg/ha | 0.7426 kg/ha | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Czechia or Niger?
- Niger, at 4.44 kg/ha against 4.03 kg/ha in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Czechia and Niger?
- 0.41 kg/ha, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Niger?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Niger rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 115th and Niger ranks 112th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).