Dominica vs Georgia: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Dominica
- Georgia
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 0.8955 kg/ha against 0.8782 kg/ha in Georgia, a difference of 0.0173 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Dominica ahead.
Dominica ranks 152nd and Georgia ranks 153rd of 176 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8403 kg/ha | 0.5693 kg/ha | 0.271 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 2000s | 0.7118 kg/ha | 1.04 kg/ha | 0.325 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0.8621 kg/ha | 1 kg/ha | 0.139 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.8916 kg/ha | 0.9172 kg/ha | 0.0256 kg/ha | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Dominica or Georgia?
- Dominica, at 0.8955 kg/ha against 0.8782 kg/ha in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Dominica and Georgia?
- 0.0173 kg/ha, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Georgia rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Dominica ranks 152nd and Georgia ranks 153rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).