Ecuador vs Russian Federation: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Ecuador
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 5.58 kg/ha against 5.48 kg/ha in Ecuador, a difference of 0.1 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 101st and Russian Federation ranks 100th of 191 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.71 kg/ha | 1.36 kg/ha | 6.36 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 8.37 kg/ha | 1.27 kg/ha | 7.1 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 7.21 kg/ha | 2.93 kg/ha | 4.27 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 6.28 kg/ha | 4.85 kg/ha | 1.43 kg/ha | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Ecuador or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 5.58 kg/ha against 5.48 kg/ha in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Ecuador and Russian Federation?
- 0.1 kg/ha, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Russian Federation rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Ecuador ranks 101st and Russian Federation ranks 100th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).