Egypt vs Grenada: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Egypt
- Grenada
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 12.29 kg/ha against 12 kg/ha in Grenada, a difference of 0.29 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 48th and Grenada ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 6 and Grenada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16.35 kg/ha | 7.13 kg/ha | 9.22 kg/ha | Egypt |
| 1970s | 15.55 kg/ha | 6.89 kg/ha | 8.66 kg/ha | Egypt |
| 1980s | 19.93 kg/ha | 7.82 kg/ha | 12.1 kg/ha | Egypt |
| 1990s | 19.61 kg/ha | 9.14 kg/ha | 10.47 kg/ha | Egypt |
| 2000s | 16.8 kg/ha | 10.4 kg/ha | 6.39 kg/ha | Egypt |
| 2010s | 12.13 kg/ha | 14.77 kg/ha | 2.64 kg/ha | Grenada |
| 2020s | 12.02 kg/ha | 11.78 kg/ha | 0.2362 kg/ha | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Egypt or Grenada?
- Egypt, at 12.29 kg/ha against 12 kg/ha in Grenada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Egypt and Grenada?
- 0.29 kg/ha, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Grenada?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Grenada rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Egypt ranks 48th and Grenada ranks 51st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).