Fiji vs Latvia: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Fiji
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 7.31 kg/ha against 6.75 kg/ha in Fiji, a difference of 0.56 kg/ha.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 89th and Latvia ranks 86th of 191 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.1 kg/ha | 0.3574 kg/ha | 8.75 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2000s | 9.68 kg/ha | 0.2172 kg/ha | 9.46 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2010s | 8.9 kg/ha | 2.62 kg/ha | 6.28 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2020s | 7.97 kg/ha | 6.41 kg/ha | 1.56 kg/ha | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Fiji or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 7.31 kg/ha against 6.75 kg/ha in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Fiji and Latvia?
- 0.56 kg/ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Latvia rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Fiji ranks 89th and Latvia ranks 86th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).