Kyrgyzstan vs Montenegro: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Montenegro
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 6.7 kg/ha against 6.43 kg/ha in Montenegro, a difference of 0.27 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 86th and Montenegro ranks 88th of 176 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.26 kg/ha | 5.55 kg/ha | 3.29 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 5.23 kg/ha | 6.3 kg/ha | 1.07 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 7.34 kg/ha | 6.39 kg/ha | 0.9496 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Kyrgyzstan or Montenegro?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 6.7 kg/ha against 6.43 kg/ha in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Kyrgyzstan and Montenegro?
- 0.27 kg/ha, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Montenegro rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 86th and Montenegro ranks 88th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).