Lesotho vs Luxembourg: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Lesotho
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 1.2 kg/ha against 1.07 kg/ha in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.13 kg/ha.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 161st and Luxembourg ranks 163rd of 191 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.76 kg/ha | 1.45 kg/ha | 0.316 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 1.28 kg/ha | 1.08 kg/ha | 0.2009 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 1.9 kg/ha | 1.14 kg/ha | 0.7607 kg/ha | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Lesotho or Luxembourg?
- Lesotho, at 1.2 kg/ha against 1.07 kg/ha in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Lesotho and Luxembourg?
- 0.13 kg/ha, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Luxembourg rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Lesotho ranks 161st and Luxembourg ranks 163rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).