Lesotho vs Uzbekistan: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Lesotho
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 1.73 kg/ha against 1.2 kg/ha in Lesotho, a difference of 0.53 kg/ha.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.4 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Lesotho ranks 146th and Uzbekistan ranks 143rd of 176 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.72 kg/ha | 1.24 kg/ha | 0.4834 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 1.76 kg/ha | 0.768 kg/ha | 0.9962 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 1.28 kg/ha | 1.36 kg/ha | 0.085 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 1.9 kg/ha | 1.91 kg/ha | 0.0131 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Lesotho or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 1.73 kg/ha against 1.2 kg/ha in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Lesotho and Uzbekistan?
- 0.53 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Uzbekistan rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Lesotho ranks 146th and Uzbekistan ranks 143rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).