Lithuania vs Uganda: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Lithuania
- Uganda
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 10.89 kg/ha against 10.81 kg/ha in Uganda, a difference of 0.08 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uganda ahead.
Lithuania ranks 59th and Uganda ranks 60th of 176 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.62 kg/ha | 8.1 kg/ha | 6.49 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 2000s | 2.2 kg/ha | 9.77 kg/ha | 7.57 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 2010s | 7.78 kg/ha | 9.26 kg/ha | 1.49 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 2020s | 10.43 kg/ha | 10.71 kg/ha | 0.2798 kg/ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Lithuania or Uganda?
- Lithuania, at 10.89 kg/ha against 10.81 kg/ha in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Lithuania and Uganda?
- 0.08 kg/ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Uganda?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Uganda rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Lithuania ranks 59th and Uganda ranks 60th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).