Luxembourg vs Turkmenistan: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Luxembourg
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 1.13 kg/ha against 1.07 kg/ha in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.06 kg/ha.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 148th and Turkmenistan ranks 147th of 176 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.45 kg/ha | 0.9495 kg/ha | 0.4988 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 1.08 kg/ha | 0.9379 kg/ha | 0.1395 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 1.14 kg/ha | 1.1 kg/ha | 0.0373 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Luxembourg or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 1.13 kg/ha against 1.07 kg/ha in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Luxembourg and Turkmenistan?
- 0.06 kg/ha, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Turkmenistan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Turkmenistan rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Luxembourg ranks 148th and Turkmenistan ranks 147th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).