Peru vs Tonga: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Peru
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 4.83 kg/ha against 4.76 kg/ha in Peru, a difference of 0.07 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 107th and Tonga ranks 105th of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 4 and Tonga in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.54 kg/ha | 2.77 kg/ha | 1.76 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1970s | 3.53 kg/ha | 3.28 kg/ha | 0.2437 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1980s | 3.41 kg/ha | 4.54 kg/ha | 1.13 kg/ha | Tonga |
| 1990s | 3.1 kg/ha | 4.13 kg/ha | 1.03 kg/ha | Tonga |
| 2000s | 4.58 kg/ha | 3.83 kg/ha | 0.7473 kg/ha | Peru |
| 2010s | 5.19 kg/ha | 4.9 kg/ha | 0.2884 kg/ha | Peru |
| 2020s | 4.66 kg/ha | 4.83 kg/ha | 0.1712 kg/ha | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Peru or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 4.83 kg/ha against 4.76 kg/ha in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Peru and Tonga?
- 0.07 kg/ha, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Tonga?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Peru and Tonga rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Peru ranks 107th and Tonga ranks 105th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).