Sweden vs Yugoslav SFR: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Sweden
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 2.77 kg/ha against 2.75 kg/ha in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Yugoslav SFR ahead.
Sweden ranks 132nd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 134th of 191 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3549 kg/ha | 2.74 kg/ha | 2.39 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 0.4152 kg/ha | 1.73 kg/ha | 1.32 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 1.94 kg/ha | 2.57 kg/ha | 0.6228 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 1.72 kg/ha | 2.52 kg/ha | 0.8034 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Sweden or Yugoslav SFR?
- Sweden, at 2.77 kg/ha against 2.75 kg/ha in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Sweden and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.02 kg/ha, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Sweden and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Sweden ranks 132nd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 134th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).