United Republic of Tanzania vs Uruguay: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area

United Republic of Tanzania
13.42 kg/ha
in 2023
Uruguay
41.26 kg/ha
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th
Uruguay rank
6th

Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time

  • United Republic of Tanzania
  • Uruguay
020406080100196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 41.26 kg/ha against 13.42 kg/ha in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 27.84 kg/ha.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 3.1 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th and Uruguay ranks 6th of 18 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, United Republic of Tanzania averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Republic of Tanzania Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 2.66 kg/ha 0.6925 kg/ha 1.97 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 3.33 kg/ha 2.03 kg/ha 1.3 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 4.44 kg/ha 4.5 kg/ha 0.0632 kg/ha Uruguay
1990s 6.2 kg/ha 4.26 kg/ha 1.94 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 10.24 kg/ha 24.68 kg/ha 14.44 kg/ha Uruguay
2010s 15.68 kg/ha 78.53 kg/ha 62.85 kg/ha Uruguay
2020s 13.77 kg/ha 67.57 kg/ha 53.8 kg/ha Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, United Republic of Tanzania or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 41.26 kg/ha against 13.42 kg/ha in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between United Republic of Tanzania and Uruguay?
27.84 kg/ha, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Republic of Tanzania and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do United Republic of Tanzania and Uruguay rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th and Uruguay ranks 6th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Republic of Tanzania vs Uruguay: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/biological-fixation-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/united-republic-of-tanzania/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/biological-fixation-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/united-republic-of-tanzania/uruguay/">United Republic of Tanzania vs Uruguay: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
223 places, 12,870 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).