Cambodia vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Buffalo — Losses from manure treated

Cambodia
4.84 million kg
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1.81 million kg
in 2023
Cambodia rank
11th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
12th

Buffalo — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Cambodia
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
02.0M4.0M6.0M196119922023

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 4.84 million kg against 1.81 million kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 3.03 million kg.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 2.7 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.

Cambodia ranks 11th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 12th of 60 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 4.25 million kg 498,310 kg 3.75 million kg Cambodia
1970s 4.59 million kg 883,011 kg 3.71 million kg Cambodia
1980s 4.19 million kg 1.51 million kg 2.69 million kg Cambodia
1990s 5.50 million kg 1.85 million kg 3.65 million kg Cambodia
2000s 5.03 million kg 2.34 million kg 2.69 million kg Cambodia
2010s 4.96 million kg 2.95 million kg 2.02 million kg Cambodia
2020s 4.86 million kg 2.68 million kg 2.18 million kg Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — losses from manure treated, Cambodia or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Cambodia, at 4.84 million kg against 1.81 million kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — losses from manure treated between Cambodia and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
3.03 million kg, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for buffalo — losses from manure treated?
Cambodia ranks 11th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 12th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Buffalo — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/cambodia/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/cambodia/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Cambodia vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Buffalo — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).