China, Hong Kong SAR vs Mauritius: Buffalo — Losses from manure treated

China, Hong Kong SAR
2,438 kg
in 2023
Mauritius
14.98 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
28th
Mauritius rank
30th

Buffalo — Losses from manure treated over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Mauritius
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 2,438 kg against 14.98 kg in Mauritius, a difference of 2,423 kg.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 162.8 times Mauritius's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 28th and Mauritius ranks 30th of 60 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 10,679 kg 13.18 kg 10,666 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 6,143 kg 14.98 kg 6,128 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 706.06 kg 14.98 kg 691.08 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 1,223 kg 14.98 kg 1,208 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 1,994 kg 14.98 kg 1,979 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 2,190 kg 14.98 kg 2,175 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 2,418 kg 14.98 kg 2,403 kg China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — losses from manure treated, China, Hong Kong SAR or Mauritius?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 2,438 kg against 14.98 kg in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — losses from manure treated between China, Hong Kong SAR and Mauritius?
2,423 kg, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Mauritius rank globally for buffalo — losses from manure treated?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 28th and Mauritius ranks 30th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Mauritius: Buffalo — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/mauritius/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Mauritius: Buffalo — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).