Jordan vs Singapore: Buffalo — Losses from manure treated

Jordan
0 kg
in 2023
Singapore
145.58 kg
in 1991
Jordan rank
31st
Singapore rank
29th

Buffalo — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Jordan
  • Singapore
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 145.58 kg against 0 kg in Jordan, a difference of 145.58 kg.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Jordan ranks 31st and Singapore ranks 29th of 60 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kg 23,082 kg 23,082 kg Singapore
1970s 0 kg 14,412 kg 14,412 kg Singapore
1980s 0 kg 1,783 kg 1,783 kg Singapore
1990s 0 kg 181.97 kg 181.97 kg Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — losses from manure treated, Jordan or Singapore?
Singapore, at 145.58 kg against 0 kg in Jordan as of 1991.
What is the difference in buffalo — losses from manure treated between Jordan and Singapore?
145.58 kg, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Singapore?
31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
How do Jordan and Singapore rank globally for buffalo — losses from manure treated?
Jordan ranks 31st and Singapore ranks 29th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Singapore: Buffalo — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/jordan/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/jordan/singapore/">Jordan vs Singapore: Buffalo — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).