Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs OECD: Buffalo — Losses from manure treated

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
10.75 million kg
in 2023
OECD
6.08 million kg
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
9th
OECD rank
11th

Buffalo — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • OECD
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M196119922023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 10.75 million kg against 6.08 million kg in OECD, a difference of 4.67 million kg.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 1.8 times OECD's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and OECD ranks 11th of 28 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) OECD Difference Ahead
1960s 5.21 million kg 1.17 million kg 4.05 million kg Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1970s 5.98 million kg 1.12 million kg 4.86 million kg Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 8.43 million kg 1.45 million kg 6.97 million kg Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 10.17 million kg 1.78 million kg 8.39 million kg Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 10.49 million kg 3.19 million kg 7.29 million kg Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 11.70 million kg 5.48 million kg 6.22 million kg Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 11.70 million kg 6.03 million kg 5.67 million kg Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — losses from manure treated, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or OECD?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 10.75 million kg against 6.08 million kg in OECD as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — losses from manure treated between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and OECD?
4.67 million kg, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and OECD?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and OECD rank globally for buffalo — losses from manure treated?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and OECD ranks 11th of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).