Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs OECD: Buffalo — Losses from manure treated
Buffalo — Losses from manure treated over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- OECD
How they compare
OECD currently reports 6.08 million kg against 1.81 million kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 4.26 million kg.
That makes OECD's figure about 3.4 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was OECD ahead.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 12th and OECD ranks 9th of 26 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 2 and OECD in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | OECD | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 498,310 kg | 1.17 million kg | 669,302 kg | OECD |
| 1970s | 883,011 kg | 1.12 million kg | 236,706 kg | OECD |
| 1980s | 1.51 million kg | 1.45 million kg | 52,035 kg | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 1.85 million kg | 1.78 million kg | 67,530 kg | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 2.34 million kg | 3.19 million kg | 852,071 kg | OECD |
| 2010s | 2.95 million kg | 5.48 million kg | 2.53 million kg | OECD |
| 2020s | 2.68 million kg | 6.03 million kg | 3.35 million kg | OECD |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher buffalo — losses from manure treated, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or OECD?
- OECD, at 6.08 million kg against 1.81 million kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in buffalo — losses from manure treated between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and OECD?
- 4.26 million kg, with OECD ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and OECD?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and OECD rank globally for buffalo — losses from manure treated?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 12th and OECD ranks 9th of 26 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).