China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Buffalo — Manure applied to soils

China, Hong Kong SAR
4,252 kg
in 2023
Jordan
1,569 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
40th
Jordan rank
42nd

Buffalo — Manure applied to soils over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Jordan
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 4,252 kg against 1,569 kg in Jordan, a difference of 2,683 kg.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 2.7 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 40th and Jordan ranks 42nd of 60 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 5 and Jordan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 18,623 kg 3,373 kg 15,250 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 10,712 kg 3,171 kg 7,542 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 1,231 kg 2,516 kg 1,285 kg Jordan
1990s 2,133 kg 2,361 kg 228.67 kg Jordan
2000s 3,478 kg 1,687 kg 1,792 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 3,820 kg 1,651 kg 2,168 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 4,218 kg 1,573 kg 2,645 kg China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — manure applied to soils, China, Hong Kong SAR or Jordan?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 4,252 kg against 1,569 kg in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — manure applied to soils between China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan?
2,683 kg, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan rank globally for buffalo — manure applied to soils?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 40th and Jordan ranks 42nd of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Buffalo — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/jordan/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Buffalo — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).