China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Buffalo — Manure applied to soils

China, Hong Kong SAR
4,252 kg
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
2,889 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
40th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
41st

Buffalo — Manure applied to soils over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Trinidad and Tobago
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 4,252 kg against 2,889 kg in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 1,363 kg.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.5 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 40th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 41st of 60 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 5 and Trinidad and Tobago in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 18,623 kg 2,372 kg 16,251 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 10,712 kg 3,156 kg 7,557 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 1,231 kg 3,715 kg 2,484 kg Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 2,133 kg 2,565 kg 432.84 kg Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 3,478 kg 2,517 kg 961.54 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 3,820 kg 2,770 kg 1,050 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 4,218 kg 2,857 kg 1,360 kg China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — manure applied to soils, China, Hong Kong SAR or Trinidad and Tobago?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 4,252 kg against 2,889 kg in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — manure applied to soils between China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago?
1,363 kg, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for buffalo — manure applied to soils?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 40th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 41st of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Buffalo — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/trinidad-and-tobago/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Buffalo — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).