Jordan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Buffalo — Manure applied to soils

Jordan
1,569 kg
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
2,889 kg
in 2023
Jordan rank
42nd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
41st

Buffalo — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Jordan
  • Trinidad and Tobago
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 2,889 kg against 1,569 kg in Jordan, a difference of 1,320 kg.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.8 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 42nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 41st of 60 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 3,373 kg 2,372 kg 1,001 kg Jordan
1970s 3,171 kg 3,156 kg 15.09 kg Jordan
1980s 2,516 kg 3,715 kg 1,199 kg Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 2,361 kg 2,565 kg 204.17 kg Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 1,687 kg 2,517 kg 829.98 kg Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 1,651 kg 2,770 kg 1,119 kg Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 1,573 kg 2,857 kg 1,284 kg Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — manure applied to soils, Jordan or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 2,889 kg against 1,569 kg in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — manure applied to soils between Jordan and Trinidad and Tobago?
1,320 kg, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for buffalo — manure applied to soils?
Jordan ranks 42nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 41st of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Buffalo — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/jordan/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/jordan/trinidad-and-tobago/">Jordan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Buffalo — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).