Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Buffalo — Manure applied to soils

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
26.21 million kg
in 2023
Myanmar
26.34 million kg
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
8th
Myanmar rank
6th

Buffalo — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Myanmar
10.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M196119922023

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 26.34 million kg against 26.21 million kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 127,800 kg.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Myanmar ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th and Myanmar ranks 6th of 26 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 3 and Myanmar in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 7.63 million kg 15.70 million kg 8.07 million kg Myanmar
1970s 13.50 million kg 21.45 million kg 7.96 million kg Myanmar
1980s 23.01 million kg 26.36 million kg 3.35 million kg Myanmar
1990s 27.22 million kg 27.89 million kg 663,450 kg Myanmar
2000s 34.29 million kg 34.09 million kg 196,070 kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 43.60 million kg 39.24 million kg 4.37 million kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 39.47 million kg 25.95 million kg 13.52 million kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — manure applied to soils, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at 26.34 million kg against 26.21 million kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — manure applied to soils between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar?
127,800 kg, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar rank globally for buffalo — manure applied to soils?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th and Myanmar ranks 6th of 26 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Buffalo — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/myanmar/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Buffalo — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).