Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs USSR: Buffalo — Manure applied to soils

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
26.21 million kg
in 2023
USSR
13.08 million kg
in 1991
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
8th
USSR rank
9th

Buffalo — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • USSR
10.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 26.21 million kg against 13.08 million kg in USSR, a difference of 13.13 million kg.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 2.0 times USSR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was USSR ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th and USSR ranks 9th of 26 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 3 and USSR in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) USSR Difference Ahead
1960s 7.63 million kg 13.06 million kg 5.43 million kg USSR
1970s 13.50 million kg 13.22 million kg 274,455 kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 23.01 million kg 11.41 million kg 11.60 million kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 25.48 million kg 13.16 million kg 12.32 million kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — manure applied to soils, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or USSR?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 26.21 million kg against 13.08 million kg in USSR as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — manure applied to soils between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and USSR?
13.13 million kg, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and USSR?
31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and USSR rank globally for buffalo — manure applied to soils?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th and USSR ranks 9th of 26 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs USSR: Buffalo — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/ussr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/ussr/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs USSR: Buffalo — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).