China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Buffalo — Manure left on pasture

China, Hong Kong SAR
7,806 kg
in 2023
Jordan
1,692 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
35th
Jordan rank
36th

Buffalo — Manure left on pasture over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Jordan
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 7,806 kg against 1,692 kg in Jordan, a difference of 6,114 kg.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 4.6 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 35th and Jordan ranks 36th of 60 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 6 and Jordan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 34,186 kg 3,639 kg 30,547 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 19,664 kg 3,421 kg 16,243 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 2,260 kg 2,715 kg 454.81 kg Jordan
1990s 3,915 kg 2,548 kg 1,367 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 6,385 kg 1,820 kg 4,565 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 7,011 kg 1,782 kg 5,230 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 7,742 kg 1,697 kg 6,045 kg China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — manure left on pasture, China, Hong Kong SAR or Jordan?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 7,806 kg against 1,692 kg in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — manure left on pasture between China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan?
6,114 kg, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan rank globally for buffalo — manure left on pasture?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 35th and Jordan ranks 36th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Manure left on pasture (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Buffalo — Manure left on pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/jordan/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Buffalo — Manure left on pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Manure left on pasture (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).