Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Micronesia: Buffalo — Manure left on pasture that volatilises
Buffalo — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Micronesia
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 9.97 million kg against 1,491 kg in Micronesia, a difference of 9.97 million kg.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 6,685.2 times Micronesia's.
Across all 29 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 13th and Micronesia ranks 10th of 26 groups.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Micronesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.85 million kg | 1,154 kg | 10.85 million kg | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 13.05 million kg | 1,189 kg | 13.05 million kg | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 16.60 million kg | 1,413 kg | 16.59 million kg | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 15.02 million kg | 1,482 kg | 15.02 million kg | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher buffalo — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Micronesia?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 9.97 million kg against 1,491 kg in Micronesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in buffalo — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Micronesia?
- 9.97 million kg, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Micronesia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Micronesia rank globally for buffalo — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 13th and Micronesia ranks 10th of 26 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).