China, Hong Kong SAR vs Poland: Buffalo — Manure management

China, Hong Kong SAR
6,691 kg
in 2023
Poland
19,538 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
40th
Poland rank
38th

Buffalo — Manure management over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Poland
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 19,538 kg against 6,691 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 12,847 kg.

That makes Poland's figure about 2.9 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2018 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 40th and Poland ranks 38th of 60 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Poland Difference Ahead
2010s 6,311 kg 0 kg 6,311 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 6,636 kg 4,884 kg 1,752 kg China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — manure management, China, Hong Kong SAR or Poland?
Poland, at 19,538 kg against 6,691 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — manure management between China, Hong Kong SAR and Poland?
12,847 kg, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Poland?
6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Poland rank globally for buffalo — manure management?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 40th and Poland ranks 38th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Poland: Buffalo — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/poland/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Poland: Buffalo — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).