China, Hong Kong SAR vs Suriname: Buffalo — Manure management

China, Hong Kong SAR
6,691 kg
in 2023
Suriname
454.05 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
40th
Suriname rank
43rd

Buffalo — Manure management over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Suriname
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 6,691 kg against 454.05 kg in Suriname, a difference of 6,237 kg.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 14.7 times Suriname's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 40th and Suriname ranks 43rd of 60 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 29,302 kg 0 kg 29,302 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 16,855 kg 0 kg 16,855 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 1,937 kg 122.41 kg 1,815 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 3,355 kg 292.76 kg 3,063 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 5,473 kg 229.69 kg 5,243 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 6,010 kg 357.34 kg 5,652 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 6,636 kg 465.81 kg 6,170 kg China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — manure management, China, Hong Kong SAR or Suriname?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 6,691 kg against 454.05 kg in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — manure management between China, Hong Kong SAR and Suriname?
6,237 kg, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Suriname rank globally for buffalo — manure management?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 40th and Suriname ranks 43rd of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Suriname: Buffalo — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/suriname/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Suriname: Buffalo — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).