China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Buffalo — Manure management

China, Hong Kong SAR
6,691 kg
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
2,889 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
40th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
41st

Buffalo — Manure management over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Trinidad and Tobago
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 6,691 kg against 2,889 kg in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 3,802 kg.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 2.3 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 40th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 41st of 60 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 6 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 29,302 kg 2,372 kg 26,930 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 16,855 kg 3,156 kg 13,699 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 1,937 kg 3,715 kg 1,778 kg Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 3,355 kg 2,565 kg 790.03 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 5,473 kg 2,517 kg 2,956 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 6,010 kg 2,770 kg 3,240 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 6,636 kg 2,857 kg 3,779 kg China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher buffalo — manure management, China, Hong Kong SAR or Trinidad and Tobago?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 6,691 kg against 2,889 kg in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in buffalo — manure management between China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago?
3,802 kg, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for buffalo — manure management?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 40th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 41st of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Buffalo — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/buffalo-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/trinidad-and-tobago/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Buffalo — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Buffalo — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 4,384 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).