Jordan vs Mauritius: Buffalo — Manure management
Buffalo — Manure management over time
- Jordan
- Mauritius
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 1,569 kg against 44.38 kg in Mauritius, a difference of 1,525 kg.
That makes Jordan's figure about 35.3 times Mauritius's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 49th and Mauritius ranks 52nd of 69 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,373 kg | 39.06 kg | 3,334 kg | Jordan |
| 1970s | 3,171 kg | 44.38 kg | 3,126 kg | Jordan |
| 1980s | 2,516 kg | 44.38 kg | 2,472 kg | Jordan |
| 1990s | 2,361 kg | 44.38 kg | 2,317 kg | Jordan |
| 2000s | 1,687 kg | 44.38 kg | 1,642 kg | Jordan |
| 2010s | 1,651 kg | 44.38 kg | 1,607 kg | Jordan |
| 2020s | 1,573 kg | 44.38 kg | 1,528 kg | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher buffalo — manure management, Jordan or Mauritius?
- Jordan, at 1,569 kg against 44.38 kg in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in buffalo — manure management between Jordan and Mauritius?
- 1,525 kg, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Mauritius?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Mauritius rank globally for buffalo — manure management?
- Jordan ranks 49th and Mauritius ranks 52nd of 69 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Buffalo — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).